RSLtaken

Good luck and I wish you all the best.

If you buy a Ballista you need to get Warbond to get the LTI. That means adding new money.

I like the Starfarer G and have one. As for will it make you enough money to buy a 600i in 3 to 6 months in game, we have no idea at all. The game play is not in and we have no idea how easy or profitable it will be. But if I had to guess I would say it be easier to get a 600i using the Starfarer to make money, than it would getting a Starfarer using the profits of the 600i. As you are more interested in exploring I would say go 600i. As we have no idea how long it take to get that ship in game. This will mean you do not have to grind for that ship in game and lets you do the game play you want sooner. I have to ask, but is that the only ship you have?

The first ship with size 7 missiles is a ground vehicle. Have they changed the way missile sizes work. I thought everything after size 4, so size 5 on was a torpedo. Is anyone thinking of getting one.

Where did you get that from?

Cant you do a mission or two to get some money.

What ship are you using? Where are you going?

Thanks for the info

I have not been playing a great amount and when I do I mostly just mess about. So I want to ask the people who have been min-maxing their loadout in game what do you think is the best loadouts. By that I mean what the best power plants, coolers, shield generators and quantum drives. Thought it might help me and other people that own one of the ships or thinking about buying one.

And everybody's celebratin' Prepare yourself for the ultimate in opulence as the Origin Celebration takes off next week, featuring the new and improved 300 series, ship customization, and complimentary test-flights .

That Prowler looking good, 20 people it can drop off not bad.

I found this video and thought some people might like it.

Good to hear they are working on the damage. Also what to see what they do with the harvestable items.

Hope CIG do and I think they will, as Chris will want it running as good as he can get it on everything. From what I under stand a lot of game are optimized for both but one a little more than the other. But that could because a lot of reasons. They had more one type of card because X reason so just got optimized because more people at the company was using it. They had backing from one of the companies so spent just that little long working on that company cards or got a little more help from that company on the best ways of optimizing for their cards. Better driver support for that game. What engine the game is based off might help one card or the other a little. But in the real word it probably a little of everything. I do think everyone should be ok AMD or Nvidia, RTX or Vega. Unless the new cards come out next year and have a 100% jump in performance and CIG want to use all that again, then I think we all need to buy new card. But that not going to happen.

I think CIG did say they are doing Vulkan. The Vega 64 is a good card, great for the money. But do not base everything off one game. As it might be closer in other games. As the 2080 ti had a 29 FPS drop in performance going from DX11 to Vulkan, I hold them number with a grain of salt. Might be Nvidia card are just that bad with Vulkan at this time. Or could be that game was made to run as good as it can on that hard wear used in AMD cards, affecting how it might run on other cards. Would like to see the 2k number and what number you get on DX12 if the game supports that. Also when No man sky Vulkan support comes out of beta you can see the FPS numbers in that. But Vulkan is meant to be good, more games that take it up. The more Nvidia will be forced to improve drivers for it. So I see that 20% gap with 2080 and Vega 64 being a lot less to about even. So still getting 2080 performance for a couple hundred cheaper not bad.