Jump to content


Community Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Karon

  • Rank
    Contribution Rank 0

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    London, UK
  • Interests
    DCS, ArmA3, SC, Il2

Recent Profile Visitors

459 profile views
  1. Karon

    Preferred flying setup

    Exactly. My point is simple: don't rush buying 1000£ worth of hardware just for Star Citizen. If you play flight sims or stuff were higher level hardware make a different than go for it, otherwise it's a waste (in my opinion of course).
  2. If you remember my old discussion about melting the polaris, this ship has just killed my doubts: Orion re-melted, Hammerhead bought! The Polaris, compared to the HH, will have a different role, they complete each other, but its running costs and the number of required people that worried me. That being said, keep the one you prefer. The HH suits me best and works decently along my current fleet. @RSLtaken sounds good. I wonder when we will see the Pioneer ship + the "settlement" mechanic in-game.
  3. Karon

    Preferred flying setup

    A lot of people love the idea of 2xSticks. Altough if you play different games (DCS), it's a bit of waste. I currently have: Virpil Mongoos T-50 + extensions (I still have my old CH Fighterstick) Thustmaster TWCS (waiting for the release of the Virpil Throttle: https://virpil.com/en/blog/89-introducing-the-vpc-mongoost-50-throttle) CH Pro Throttle CH MFP Thrustmaster MFD Track IR 4 + clip (clip mandatory) Saitek TPM (I don't use it often) Now, do you need all these stuff? Not at all, especially for an arcade flight game such as Star Citizen. Actually, most of the time you can buy a cheap stick and have better results than a more expensive Warthog (wich has a terrible base, a shame because the grip is great). Also, I will be using mouse and keyboard most of the time, I don't care about small aircrafts and I don't thing bigger ones will require a stick at all. So, end of the day, what do you "need"? Nothing more than keyboard + mouse. Next step might be a cheap HOTAS and try a HOSAS if you have the chance. Get a Track IR or a free alternative though. I bought mine at least 10-12 years ago and still works like a charm.
  4. Fact is, the Polaris should have been my last ship but it turned out to be quite different from what I thought. It is a fast, not very armoured Corvette with barely sufficient AAA and that also relies on physical ordnance as main damage delivery method. In other words: - it's going to take damage because it has only 2x L shields → higher maintenance costs; - its purpose it's not fighter defence/annihilation. I doubt we'll face Capships all the time → slightly inefficient; - it relies on torpedoes → more maintenance costs. CIG has created the perfectly-imperfect capship: smaller orgs with no capship can deal with it, at the same time it can protect itselft from bigger ships due to the impressive amount of torpedoes. I'd have loved an anti-fighter Terrapin-corvette but I guess it would have created a too wide gap between tiny orgs even slightly bigger ones. That being said, I am also looking for sinergy: the Orion can mine, pass to the BMM and so on. With a dozen members we have enough people to man the ships and a basic form of provide cover and I can provide both the miner and the hauler. "Personal/solo" ships will be the Cutlass and the Prospector, plus a wilcard Pin/Tali/something else. Do you have an idea of what ships are going to be pre-released in the next few months?
  5. Lot's of good inputs, thanks everyone! I'm divided between what I think I will want // what is more efficient considering that I have spent real money on these ships. As I said, I'm fairly sure the Orion will see a big increase in its cost. An example of money-inefficiency, in my opinion, is the Vanguard. I could unmelt one but it is as expensive as a Retaliator Bomber. Not worth for me. Regarding other ships, Prospector and Cutlass sounds good when I'm solo. I just have to make up my mind and choose between Tali and Terrapin. The quote from RSLtaken is interesting although it confirms that the Pin is a quite specific type of ship. The Tali on the other hand is more flexible and, in light of the new Turrets, I could slave a couple to the computer AC, set one as PDT and by doing so, I have halved the required crew. On top of that, the Tali can swap its torpedo compartments for cargo, living quarters, dropship module. I don't have buyback tokens at the moment having unmelted the Orion, hence I have to wait. Maybe something will change. Dan has a good point. In fact, that's why I melted most of my ships and bought the Polaris in the first place. That the reason why I haven't listed the multitude of ships I could unmelt. They're simply too many or easily reacquirable in-game. Regarding the efficienty due to the fact that others ahve different ships I agree, althogh I like to have options depending on what I want to do. I also hate grinding because I don't have much time (*happy wife, happy life!*). I forgot to mention, I also have 3 Aurora game packages. I still hope they will provide free/discounted/custom NPCs like CR said back in 2014/15 - I haven't followed the game much in the last couple years.
  6. Hey there. I am looking for advices about my hangar after the last update of the Ship Matrix. I know these threads are personal because everyone has its own opinions but maybe you can shed some lights on it. At the moment I own: Polaris Banu Merchantman Cutlass Black Reasons for melting the Polaris are: - BMM is now a massive sperm whale and seems really interesting. Big ship, I plan to use it as my main ship, especially in the beginning. - Cutlass has been improved, making it a nice and versatile ship; - Production/Commerce means making money. With money I can buy and maintain Military ships later (I can unmelt both an Orion and a Prospector); - In order to crew the Polaris efficiently I need quite a lot of people. Points for keeping it: - I am not interested in the "low-level" military, I prefer capships and the Polaris is one of them; - It's cool :3 The Polaris is 750$ credits worth, these are some of the ships I can buyback: Polaris 750$ Orion 325$ Tali Bomber 250$ Prospector 140$ Reclaimer 350$ Terrapin 195$ The question is: which choises are a best investment? Ideas I have atm: 1. Orion + Reclaimer = 675$ 2. Orion + Retaliator Bomber + Prospector = 715$ 3. Orion + Terrapin + Prospector = 660$ As you can see the Orion is ubiquitous. I feel it is another BMM: undervalued for a while, it will eventually become much more expensive and useful. The first is the option I prefer the least. I'm going to have 3 massive ships with no clear sinergy and probably all of them will be time-demanding. I like the idea of the Reclaimer but I'm not totally fond of it. The other two options are similar, the only difference is which military ship I'll unmelt. I love the Tali, it has been one of my first ships but later updates somehow made it less attractive. It is flexible and customizable but it's a master of none, bombing-excluded other ships can do the same things better. Even worse, it requires a numerous crew to be 100% effective. The Pin instead is an interesting ship but we don't know really much about it. I have zero interest in exploration but it can be an interesting solo ship for scouting. I like the idea of a though little ship but its weapons are basically unexistent. The Prospector is my pocket Orion when I have some spare time and no friends available. A bit pricy but a good counterpart to the Cutlass. What do you think? Any other interesting options?
  7. Keep in mind that the definition of "cargo" is now different. See the Reclaimer, for instance.
  8. Karon

    Star Trek: Discovery

    Saw all the episodes. I'm not impressed to be honest.
  9. Karon

    Game Recording software etc. YouTube

    I tried Audacity ages ago, I think DaVinci Resolve might be a good parallel for video editing (as I mentioned there's a free version). Anyway, whatever program you're going to use, it will be certainly better than Movie Maker
  10. Karon

    Game Recording software etc. YouTube

    Isn't Adobe Premier Pro a bit expensive for an amateur? Is there any free (even features-limited) version?
  11. Karon

    Game Recording software etc. YouTube

    I used Fraps for a while but shadowplay is much better in terms of performance. You should consider it as you'll upgrade your GPU/change notebook. I do minor video editing, I started with movie maker, now I'm using DaVinci Resolve. It's free, quite easy to use. This is an example (keep in mind I don't spend too much time editing): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx_FMHdw2oY Images & co are done with GIMP.